<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your HR Rep Doesn&#039;t Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weeklyrob.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weeklyrob.com/?p=590</link>
	<description>Stuff I&#039;m thinking. On a more or less weekly basis. Don&#039;t expect much.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeklyrob</title>
		<link>http://weeklyrob.com/?p=590&#038;cpage=1#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>weeklyrob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklyrob.com/?p=590#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>I think the point is simply that conscientiousness is not as good a predictor of job performance as intelligence. Not to say it&#039;s not a good thing.

On a numerical scale, it correlates to performance less. Conscientiousness is .31, whereas intelligence is the highest factor, at .51.

Of course, I can&#039;t vouch for the studies, but if you believe the studies and are hiring for performance, then there ya go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point is simply that conscientiousness is not as good a predictor of job performance as intelligence. Not to say it&#8217;s not a good thing.</p>
<p>On a numerical scale, it correlates to performance less. Conscientiousness is .31, whereas intelligence is the highest factor, at .51.</p>
<p>Of course, I can&#8217;t vouch for the studies, but if you believe the studies and are hiring for performance, then there ya go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo</title>
		<link>http://weeklyrob.com/?p=590&#038;cpage=1#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklyrob.com/?p=590#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, interesting that the data shows that managers and HR reps believe these statements.  1- I totally disagree. Employees can&#039;t perform well if they don&#039;t know what &quot;well&quot; looks like.  2- I&#039;m not sure how I would have answered this one. Intelligence seems to be a pretty good indicator of performance, but I&#039;d want a conscientious employee too.  I think number 3 sounds ridiculous.  Of course higher intelligence is a positive thing regardless of the job.  Seems to me that a manager or HR person who thinks otherwise is insecure themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, interesting that the data shows that managers and HR reps believe these statements.  1- I totally disagree. Employees can&#8217;t perform well if they don&#8217;t know what &#8220;well&#8221; looks like.  2- I&#8217;m not sure how I would have answered this one. Intelligence seems to be a pretty good indicator of performance, but I&#8217;d want a conscientious employee too.  I think number 3 sounds ridiculous.  Of course higher intelligence is a positive thing regardless of the job.  Seems to me that a manager or HR person who thinks otherwise is insecure themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
