{"id":181,"date":"2007-06-18T10:17:27","date_gmt":"2007-06-18T15:17:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/weeklyrob.dreamhosters.com\/?p=181"},"modified":"2007-06-18T10:17:27","modified_gmt":"2007-06-18T15:17:27","slug":"blent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/?p=181","title":{"rendered":"Blent"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m reading Middlemarch, by Ms. George Eliot. I say &#8220;Ms.&#8221; to avoid the bad sit-com conversation about &#8220;George&#8221; being a man. You know what I mean:<\/p>\n<p>A: &#8220;Do you enjoy the works of George Eliot?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>B: &#8220;Oh yeah, I read his stuff all the time. Can&#8217;t get enough.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A: &#8220;But. But. But, George Eliot was a WOMAN!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>B: Insert hilarious backpeddle.<\/p>\n<p>[Note that the sit-com A character always has to SAY that Eliot is a woman. That&#8217;s because they assume that their audience doesn&#8217;t already know that. If the person B had implied that &#8220;Paris Hilton&#8221; were a man, no one would have to explain that she wasn&#8217;t. Everyone would just roll on the floor in uncontrollable mirth, thinking about character B&#8217;s ignorance.<\/p>\n<p>And it could happen! Paris was a male character in the Iliad, right? Get me a sit-com about a guy brought to the present from a few hundred years ago, and he&#8217;ll think Paris, Lauren, Robin, Jordan, Sydney, Taylor, Courteney, and many more are all dudes. OMG! Think how funny it&#8217;d be if he said that Paris Hilton was a &#8220;dude!&#8221; Sitcoms.]<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, until fairly recently, all I knew about George Eliot was that she was not a man. Actually, now that I think about it, all I know about Evelyn Waugh is that he was. I am an ignorant person.<\/p>\n<p>So Eliot&#8217;s name came up four times in three days a month ago. I don&#8217;t remember why, though I do remember that at least two of those times had something to do with how she isn&#8217;t a man. I thought, &#8220;I should read something of hers.&#8221; I think Middlemarch has made it to the top of a few lists of the greatest novels of all time, so I started there.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m about halfway through the 800 or so pages. I like it. I couldn&#8217;t have told you that she was a Victorian writer, but now I know she is, and\u00c2\u00a0I always liked\u00c2\u00a0the Victorian style of writing. Of course, I haven&#8217;t read the crappy Victorian stuff, which there surely was. But we generally read the writers who&#8217;ve stood the test of time.<\/p>\n<p>Eliot is harder than Dickens. Dickens is funny, his plot lines are simple, and he doesn&#8217;t have literary allusions on every page. Eliot seems as though she&#8217;s writing for a much more literate audience. Maybe it just seems that way because I personally don&#8217;t know the names and events that she mentions. But most of the time, those names and events are incidental to the story, and the story is really good.<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;m not here to write a book review of Middlemarch. I really just wanted to mention two things she wrote which caught my eye:<\/p>\n<p>1. She said something about how a person can ride two horses at once. This meant that you can be thinking about one thing while doing another. I love how an expression like that can so clearly place the speaker in a time frame. In this case, the time frame envelops everything before about 1930. Future generations reading\u00c2\u00a0the expression, &#8220;you sound like a broken record,&#8221; will place us exactly where we belong. In the dead past.<\/p>\n<p>2. Blent. &#8220;The habits of the different ranks were less blent than now.&#8221; Instead of &#8220;blended.&#8221; I love it. (Incidentally, I can&#8217;t tell whether she&#8217;s being sarcastic here. Does she really mean that they were less blent, or is she saying that they weren&#8217;t, even though people today (in the 1870&#8217;s)\u00c2\u00a0pretend that they were?)<!--end_qt--><!--end_q--><!--start_q--><!--start_d--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m reading Middlemarch, by Ms. George Eliot. I say &#8220;Ms.&#8221; to avoid the bad sit-com conversation about &#8220;George&#8221; being a man. You know what I mean: A: &#8220;Do you enjoy the works of George Eliot?&#8221; B: &#8220;Oh yeah, I read his stuff all the time. Can&#8217;t get enough.&#8221; A: &#8220;But. But. But, George Eliot was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-languagelit"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/weeklyrob.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}